A new feature for the web site...You can now look up  stock prices... Welcome back BJ Haynes!!!                                                 

 

                                                                                     News

                             Home News Claims Paid Penalties Div.Officers Contract Phone #'s & Links Email Search Engr Trainees Safety & Fatigue Restricted Speed RCO Incidents RR Job Openings At Work Qualifying                                        

 

 

This Page is for General Info for the Division

       

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     

Report says CSX hid worker injuries

(The following story by Lindsay Peterson appeared on the Tampa Tribune website on May 2.)

TAMPA, Fla. — Bobby Lightfoot braced himself as the train engineer hit the brakes in the Polk County rail yard, but the hard stop rippled through the railroad cars to where Lightfoot stood, throwing him over a railing and onto the pavement 8 feet below.

On the way to Brandon Regional Hospital later, one of Lightfoot's bosses at CSX Transportation told him what to do - to keep the company from having to report his injury to the federal government.

"Don't let them give you a prescription," Lightfoot says he was told. When a nurse gave him a sling, he gave it back. Not because he didn't need it but because the sling would also trigger the reporting requirement. "If my supervisors saw me in that, they'd go into orbit," he said.

Lightfoot's experience in 2003 mirrors several detailed in a Federal Railroad Administration report released last week.

The report said the actions of certain CSX supervisors sent the "chilling" message throughout the CSX system that workers who reported on-the-job injuries and sought medical treatment would be penalized.

Florida transportation officials are proposing a partnership with CSX as part of a multimillion-dollar deal to buy CSX tracks for an Orlando commuter rail system. The commuter trains would share the tracks with CSX freight trains, and the state would take the liability for accidents on the line, even those caused by CSX.

The liability provision requires the approval of the Florida Legislature and has passed in the House. It was stripped out of the Senate's transportation bill, but supporters of the deal say it could be restored before the session ends today.

Last week's federal report repeated the findings of October's draft report, adding details of 19 cases from Georgia to New York in which federal officials say CSX's harassment and intimidation of injured workers violated safety rules.

CSX pays bonuses to supervisors who keep injury reports low. The company boasted to shareholders last year that its "reportable injury" rate had dropped 40 percent in three years.

Federal regulators say that stifling injury reporting can disguise serious safety problems, and the rail administration report recommended that the company be fined.

Based in Jacksonville, CSX is a Fortune 500 company that operates in 23 states with about 35,000 employees. It controls about 1,700 miles of tracks across Florida.

In response to the federal report and other harassment allegations, spokesman Gary Sease said the company "does not tolerate intimidation or harassment of injured employees."

The company has implemented measures to correct the "isolated instances of this behavior" that federal inspectors found, Sease said.

"We will remain vigilant to ensure that all managers and employees continue to adhere to CSX's rules and ethics, including the proper care for employees who are injured and the correct reporting of that injury consistent with company and federal requirements."

Charges that railroad companies harass injured workers go back decades, federal officials say. It was so bad in the 1990s that in 1996 the federal government required companies to adopt detailed anti-harassment programs. In 2003, the Federal Railroad Administration addressed renewed problems at CSX.

Its report last week said that it was particularly concerned when it received complaints from two railroad unions in August 2006 that CSX officers were harassing workers, trying to "manage the injury reporting numbers, instead of managing safety."

After a yearlong investigation, the rail administration's safety office found that many of the union complaints were valid.

Worker Fired After Making Report

The report describes CSX supervisors telling workers that reporting an injury could end their careers. One worker was fired after making a report.

In case after case, supervisors told injured workers to return prescriptions they'd received and have their doctors remove medication orders from their records. In one case, a man who had injured his leg and foot in a derailment was told he couldn't have crutches. The railroad is required to report all injuries serious enough for the worker to need prescription drugs or medical equipment, including crutches and slings.

In the 2006 derailment case in Russell, Ky., the injured man was prevented from going home after being treated at the emergency room. Instead, he was driven to CSX offices, where supervisors lifted him into an office chair, rolled him into a room and questioned him for four hours.

In a 2005 case in Atlanta, a man who had damaged his wrist moving a piece of equipment was discouraged from seeing his doctor. He was also told that the way his supervisor "earns his pay is not to have any reportable injuries," the federal report said.

Several of the injury cases the federal agency investigated involved larger safety problems, such as a derailment, defective equipment and leaking chemicals.

Five CSX workers in Florida interviewed by the Tribune said employee harassment continues. The federal legislative director of the United Transportation Union, which represents (some) railroad workers, agreed.

"We know this is still a continuing problem and hope there's improvement," said the union's James Brunkenhoefer.

Supervisor 'Chewed Me Up'

Lightfoot, 54, said one of the first things he thought after flying off the train south of Bradley Junction was that he didn't want the trouble he knew would come with an injury report.

In 1990, he was badly shaken up when the train he was conducting hit a pickup. An emergency room doctor gave him prescription drugs, but his bosses told him to return them, and he did.

Six years later, he complained about a loud ringing in his ears after a hose popped near his head. Instead of taking Lightfoot to a doctor, he said, a supervisor took him to a drugstore for medicine.

Lightfoot already had a reputation for calling the CSX hot line to report safety problems he saw on the tracks. Bosses called him "Hot Line Lightfoot," he said. After a knee injury in 2001, he said, a supervisor took him into a room and lambasted him as the "most unsafe" employee he knew.

"He chewed me up one side and down the other," Lightfoot said. "They say they want you to report things, but when you do, they don't like it."

In 2003, Lightfoot was in the middle of his shift when he was thrown off the train, landing on his feet. His back began to hurt, but he hoped it would ease up, so he finished his shift. The next morning, he could barely move his shoulder, which was twisted as he lost his grip on the rail car railing. He called a supervisor, who took him to the hospital in Brandon.

By the end of the next weekend, Lightfoot's back was worse. Soon diagnosed with a sprain, he left his conducting duties for physical therapy. After returning to work five months later, he hurt his back again pulling hard on a rail switch to shift rail traffic from one set of tracks to another.

This time, Lightfoot said, his supervisor in Tampa was so angry at the news that he brought Lightfoot into a room, saying Lightfoot couldn't leave until he explained in detail what had happened.

The conversation became heated and Lightfoot said he finally left the room. His medical records show that discs in his middle and lower back had ruptured.

He hasn't been back to work at CSX since that day in November 2003. His doctor told him that if he didn't leave the railroad, he'd wind up in a wheelchair, said his wife, Sandra.

Lightfoot sued CSX in his 2003 accident when he was flipped off the train. A jury found that CSX's negligence contributed to the accident, but it held Lightfoot partly responsible, too. A judge ordered CSX to pay $240,600. After attorney fees and court costs, Lightfoot said he got about $115,000.

Despite her husband's bad experiences, Sandra Lightfoot says he misses the railroad, where he worked for 31 years. "He switches cars in his sleep," she said. "He'll say, 'You watch out, somebody's going to get hurt on that.'"

Friday, May 02, 2008

                            

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

This was forwarded to me and I'm sure to most of you but here it is for anybody who didn't see it

Brothers:

 
Here is the official DOT Press Release concerning the new SOFA related Rule violations that will be enforced by the FRA.
 
Larry James
BLET System Labor Liaison
 
 
Subject: DOT Press Release

DOT takes action to reduce train accidents caused by human error,

(The U.S. Department of Transportation issued the following on February 13.)

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Reducing common mistakes that result in nearly half of all human factor-caused train accidents is the aim of a new federal regulation that places greater accountability on both railroad management and employees for complying with basic operating rules, announced U.S. Transportation Secretary Mary E. Peters.

“We are tackling several commonplace errors that can lead to serious train accidents,” said Secretary Peters, noting issuance of this rule is the centerpiece of the Federal Railroad Administration’s (FRA) National Rail Safety Action Plan.

Peters explained that relatively simple errors such as improperly lined track switches, shoving rail cars without a person in front to monitor for clear track ahead, and leaving rail cars in a position that obstruct or foul an active track may now result in a violation of federal rail safety regulations. At present, these types of mistakes are generally only subject to internal railroad standard operating procedures and addressed through employee disciplinary procedures or other corrective actions.

“We want everyone to know how to do their jobs safely every time, every day, no matter what task they are performing,” said FRA Administrator Joseph H. Boardman, stressing that stricter adherence to core operating rules will prevent train accidents and employee injuries.

Boardman said the federal rule essentially defines three distinct levels of responsibility and accountability including: railroad managers for putting in place programs designed to test employees for proficiency in abiding by applicable operating rules; supervisors for properly administering such operational tests; and employees for complying with the rules. Under the regulations, employees will have a “right of challenge” should they be instructed to take actions that, in good faith, they believe would violate the rules. FRA will actively monitor compliance with these requirements through inspections and audits, and certain violations may result in a fine ranging from $7,500 to $16,000. In some cases, individuals may also be subject to personal liability, he said.

FRA undertook development of this final rule after detecting an increase in human factor-caused train accidents in recent years. Additional impetus was provided by a January 2005 accident in Graniteville, SC, that killed nine people. The accident occurred when a train was erroneously diverted off a mainline track due to an improperly lined switch, then collided with a parked train, and resulted in the release of toxic chlorine gas from three tank cars.

A complete copy of the final rule can be found at www.fra.dot.gov.

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

This article is from the BLE&T Website

Rail employees testify to Congress about accident reporting abuses

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Rail union employees from Union Pacific and Norfolk Southern railroads testified yesterday before a House committee about how their supervisors discouraged them from reporting serious accidents or even delayed treatment for their injuries.

The House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee hearing focused on harassment and intimidation of rail workers. Some railroads coerce employees to not report on-the-job accidents and injuries. Thus, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) may never be notified about a large number of injuries and accidents. As a result, FRA safety statistics may not accurately reflect the number of accidents and injuries in the industry.

“I was struck in the head by a piece of steel on a rail car brought into Kansas City,” said Greg Haskins, a former Union Pacific employee. “When I came to, I was lying face down in my own blood. No call to 911 was ever made. No one volunteered to rush me to an emergency room.”

Haskins did not receive medical attention for more than two hours. He finally was sent home to take aspirin, his head bandaged. The following day, through intervention of his family, he was seen by a neurological surgeon in Kansas City and diagnosed with Post Concussive Syndrome. Haskins now suffers from depression and other serious medical issues and no longer works on the rails, something that was once his lifelong ambition.

Former Norfolk Southern employee Timothy Knisely testified that when he attempted to disconnect an air hose from a set of rail cars, the hose broke loose, continually striking him in the head, chest, arms and legs with 80 pounds of pressure.

“The trainmaster tried to persuade me to not report the injury,” Knisely said. “But I resisted his pressure and reported it. The next day I was charged with making a false report. After 27 years of dedicated and loyal service to the railroad, I was subsequently charged with lying about being struck in the head and eventually fired.”

David Cook, a former CSX locomotive engineer and a member of Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen (BLET) Division 769 in Sanford, Florida, also testified about his experiences after being injured on the railroad. In closing his statement, he implored the Committee to ensure that railroad workers are treated better.

“U.S. workers deserve to be treated with dignity and respect in their workplace and this has not been happening,” Cook said. “U.S. railroad companies are guilty as charged based on the clear facts. While the U.S. railroads should continue to educate employees to improve safety, intimidating employees through threats and false FRA test failures is an unacceptable means of creating misleading and faulty safety records.”

“Haskins, Knisley and Cook’s experiences are just three examples of mistreatment that rail employees are forced to endure,” said John Tolman, Vice President and National Legislative Representative of the BLET during testimony at the hearing. “We are here today to bring experiences like these to light.”

Tolman also thanked lawmakers for passage last week of H.R. 2095, the Federal Railroad Safety Improvement Act of 2007. Included in the bill is a provision that guarantees the right to prompt medical attention and makes it unlawful for a railroad to interfere in the relationship between an injured railroad worker and his or her doctor.

The Teamsters Rail Conference represents more than 70,000 locomotive engineers, trainmen and maintenance of way workers who are members of the BLET and the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division (BMWED). The Teamsters Union was founded in 1903 and represents more than 1.4 million hard working men and women in the United States, Canada and Puerto Rico.

Friday, October 26, 2007
bentley@ble.org

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 

House passes Rail Safety Improvement Act

WASHINGTON, D.C., October 17 — Today, representatives in the U.S. House passed the Railroad Safety Improvement Act (H.R. 2095) eliminating camp cars and decreasing limbo time, both important issues for Teamsters rail conference members.

“Our rail members, the engineers, trainmen and maintenance of way workers who ensure that this nation’s rail system runs safely, won a major victory with the passage of H.R. 2095 today,” said Jim Hoffa, Teamsters General President.

“We’ve been fighting Norfolk Southern for years about eliminating their disgusting camp cars and finally Congress is backing us up,” said Fred Simpson, President of the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes division of the Teamsters Rail Conference. “Norfolk Southern was the last railroad to keep these substandard accommodations and we will be glad to see them go. Our members should never have had to endure the cramped and unsanitary conditions in those cars.”

Camp cars are mobile dormitories that are used to house maintenance of way crew members while on assignment repairing tracks. Usually the cars house eight men each and most are not equipped with indoor toilets or potable water. Men assigned to these cars must walk outside, even in the dead of winter, to use porta-johns and drink bottled water because the water in the cars is unfit to drink.

Another part of the far-reaching act sets new limits for limbo time for locomotive engineers and trainmen. Currently, engineers and trainmen can work up to 20 hours or more per shift before they take eight hours of rest. Since their full work day can last up to 12 hours, they might spend 8 hours or more in limbo time where they can’t sleep, must remain vigilant and are not paid for that time.

“This is a step in the right direction to impede the rail carriers’ abuse of our much needed rest time,” said Don Hahs, President of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen. “The passage of H.R. 2095 means that engineers and trainmen may eventually be paid for all of the time they spend on the job. They will also have the chance to obtain adequate rest between assignments, reducing fatigue.”

Among other provisions in H.R. 2095 are:

* Restructuring of the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), placing greater emphasis on its safety role and increasing substantially the number of qualified inspectors;

* Creation of fatigue management programs, a guarantee of 10 hours of undisturbed rest, and a guarantee of one 24-hour off-duty period every seven days;

* Strengthened whistleblower protections; a worker may refuse to authorize the use of equipment the employee reasonably believes to be unsafe or hazardous to operate or work with;

* Implementation of positive train control, a technology serving as a backup device to improve the safety of locomotive engines for all rail workers;

* Vast improvement in safety for operations in un-signaled track, or dark territory;

* Certification of train conductors;

* A study of locomotive cab conditions;

* A requirement for emergency breathing apparatus in all locomotive cabs; and

* New regulations that would put an end to the harassment and intimidation of rail workers who report personal injuries.

The Teamsters Union was founded in 1903 and represents 1.4 million hardworking men and women throughout the United States, Canada and Puerto Rico. The Teamsters Rail Conference comprises the members of the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen and the members of the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division. The BLET represents 59,000 professional locomotive engineers and trainmen in the United States.

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

Schumer calls for federal probe of NY derailments

(The following story by Rob Juteau appeared on the Evening Times website on March 15.)

WASHINGTON, D.C. — After Monday’s freight train derailment in the city of Oneida that sent fireballs into the sky and forced the shutdown of schools, roads and communities for miles around, U.S. Senator Charles E. Schumer, D - NY, Wednesday called for the creation of a new National Transportation Safety Board, Federal Railroad Administration and Department of Homeland Security task force to investigate the cause of the accident, as well as the repeated incidents involving CSX freight trains across upstate New York.

Monday’s derailment was the fifth involving CSX in New York since December, which had prompted Schumer and Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton to immediately urge a federal investigation into railroad safety across the state. National Transportation Safety Board investigators arrived at the crash site Tuesday. On Wednesday, Schumer issued a report citing 23 other rail accidents in five counties of Central New York from 2000 to 2006. Those 23 rail accidents included four each in Herkimer and Montgomery counties and caused $2.3 million in damage.

“Lately we’ve had an accident almost every other week around the state,” Schumer said during a telephone conference call with reporters. “Enough is enough. For far too long, CSX has failed to prevent these incidents and protect upstate New York communities from recurring accidents. Federal regulators have not done nearly enough to crack down on the rail companies after accidents to improve and secure the rail infrastructure across the state. The task force would have the sole focus of getting to the root cause of these accidents to ensure that CSX is taking all necessary steps to avoid a catastrophe. Unfortunately, CSX’s track record this year may have put us collision course for disaster.”

The senator added that Monday’s accident was just one in a series of dozens of accidents, derailments and fatal crashes that CSX has been involved in across upstate New York. The most recent accident occurred when a CSX train traveling from Buffalo to the CSX rail yard in Selkirk derailed, igniting liquid propane tanks that created explosions that lit the dawn sky. There were 80 cars on the freight train, including 40 propane cars and two containing non-toxic inhalant hazardous material. Twenty-eight of the 80 cars jumped the tracks.

Schumer said that had the train derailed earlier — it passed through downtown Syracuse shortly before the accident — the explosion could have been devastating and chemicals could have been spewed throughout the heavily populated area. The crash forced the evacuation of hundreds in the community, closed schools and shut down a large section of the Thruway, leading to back-ups throughout Central New York.

Spokesmen for CSX and the Federal Railroad Administration responded that safety records have improved statewide and nationally last year, and for the company both last year and so far this year. “We’re not happy with any accident. We’re not happy with the fact we’ve had certain high-profile incidents this year,” CSX spokesman Robert Sullivan told the Associated Press, adding the company cooperates with all federal agencies.

“The train accident in Oneida and other recent major rail accidents in New York state are of great concern to me, and over the past 90-days I have directed the Federal Railroad Administration to take aggressive steps to find out what went wrong,” Federal Railroad Administrator Joseph H. Boardman said. “The FRA is actively conducting comprehensive accident investigations, performing a safety review of railroad bridges in western New York and scheduling one of our automated track inspection vehicles to check track across the state this spring. I have also personally met with CSX senior executives to discuss their rail safety problems and the results of a FRA focused inspection on CSX property. I am committed to taking all necessary action to determine why these accidents happened and will assess penalties against those who violated federal rail safety regulations. I have also asked the FRA regional office to expedite our investigations into CSX accidents in New York so we can use the findings to guide our next actions to prevent future accidents from occurring.”

The cleanup continued Wednesday, with eight families still kept from their homes within a half-mile radius, Madison County Fire Coordinator Joe DeFrancisco said. “We’re still burning off propane from some of the tank cars that have remaining product. They’re uplifting cars and moving them out,” he told the Associated Press. One car contained ferric chloride, a mild acid, and some leaked and requires special cleanup.

The cause of the derailment and a timetable for reopening the track have not been determined yet, Sullivan said Wednesday.

Air quality monitoring is continuing with no toxic fumes detected.

The senator’s data showed that 572 upstate rail accidents in the past seven years have caused $34 million in damage.

“To date CSX and other rail companies have gotten off with just a slap on the wrist,” Schumer said. “Unfortunately, the previous Congress failed to address these issues and let the railroads run the show and we have seen the results. We’ve got to find out what CSX is doing wrong.”

CSX’s response was to investigate each accident and try to ensure it was not repeated, as well as ongoing training, and spending on infrastructure that reached $1.4 billion last year, Sullivan said. “Last year, I believe, we had reduction in train accidents of 24 percent, and so far this year versus last year we have a reduction of 28 percent,” he said.

U.S. Department of Transportation data shows total train accidents across the country declined for the second year in a row last year, falling from 3,236 in 2005 to 2,834 in 2006. The number of accidents fell from 105 to 89 in New York state.

Schumer said the new joint task force should have the sole authority to investigate the recent CSX crashes in upstate New York, determine their cause and asses whether CSX has done enough to fix any past problems and prevent future accidents. At the conclusion of the investigation, the task force would turn over any findings of negligence to the appropriate law enforcement authorities if warranted.

The senator also wrote to the chairman and ranking members of the Senate Commerce Committee, which has jurisdiction over the freight rail industry, asking for immediate hearings on freight rail safety.

Schumer is the author of the bi-partisan Rail Crossing and Hazardous Materials Transport Act, which sets tougher minimum and maximum fines for fatal accidents and establishes new requirements for investigations, inspections and the use of new safety technology. The legislation aims to crack down on negligent railroad companies and require the broader use of modern technology to protect the public from more fatal crossing and hazardous materials accidents. The bill raises the minimum civil penalty for gross negligence resulting in a fatality to $50,000 and the maximum to $10,000,000. For gross negligence not resulting in a fatality, the fine will be at least $5,000 and not more than $2,500,000.

The legislation sets strict age restrictions for cars carrying hazardous materials by requiring every car be inspected and upgraded every 15 years. In addition, all rail cars 15 years or older currently in use must be inspected and brought up to federal code within one year. The bill would also create a new infrastructure grant program that would authorize $50 million in federal funding to complete vital infrastructure improvements.

Monday, March 19, 2007

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

AS OF JANUARY 1st 2007, TRAINMEN MAY NOW JOIN THE BLET WITH NO "UTU SENIORITY MAINTENANCE" FEE!!!!!!!!!!

I received a phone call today from Local Chairman Matty and he was letting me know that he had received a phone call from General Chairman Roberts that as of January 1st the "UTU FEE" will no longer be in effect. I had mistakenly put this on the web-site last year. A special thanks to all the trainmen who did stay with us here in the BLE&T!!!!!! ANY TRAINMEN WHO JOIN THE BLE&T, YOUR UNION DUES WILL BE BETWEEN $54.00-$55.00 PER MONTH

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   

 

 

11/30/06

Brothers:

 
FRA today issued a press release announcing the posting of the report on validation of the SAFTE fatigue model (FAST tool).  The press release, report, and a white paper on the status of FRA fatigue management activity, may be found at http://www.fra.dot.gov/us/content/1737.
 
Fraternally,
 
Tom Roberts, General Chairman
Conrail SAA/CSXT Northern District GCA
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen
A Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters

 

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  

This is from General Chairman Tom Roberts  There are 3 seperate letters, one from Tom, one from Tom Flanley and another one from Tom Roberts regarding a miss-call of an engineer on a regular assignment who refused to come in on his relief day...

Brothers --
 
Attached is a copy of what appears to be a Tom Flanley email, intercepted by this office, which chronicles the latest CMC Trap directed toward CSX T&E by the Crew Management Center.
 
This scheme is aimed at our Members who, once they have been refused permission to be off for Personal Business, etc., will be written up by Crew Dispatchers who have been directed to "lie behind a log" after refusing anyone a mark-off with permission, and wait until that Employee calls back and tries to mark off "Sick."  Anyone doing this will face discipline, according to Flanley, for "falsifying a layoff."  So, because the memo exposes the fact that CMC has no intention of allowing you to be off for Personal Business, Personal Day, or Single Day Vacation, you must expect to be denied permission for anything but "sick."  Also, anyone successfully marking off "sick" can expect to be asked for proof of illness.  Be mindful you're on a taped line; choose your words carefully.
 
This attempt at entrapment is unacceptable to this office, and I am sure it will not be accepted by any other General Committee on CSX.  Nevertheless, while we fight with CSX, right now your job is to pass the word around that a trap has been set for our Members by the CMC Dismissal Machine.
 
CMC is really proud of their dismissal tricks and entrapment, but they're still unable to reliably hire/qualify enough people, and still can't reliably call the right crew for the right train. Please be careful!
 
Fraternally,
=======================================================================================
 
From: Flanley, Thomas
Subject: Handling / Documenting / Procedures

Effective immediately, We will be handling T & E Employees attempting to mark off under false pretenses in the following manner. We will also handle Crew Dispatchers that may be involved.

T & E Employees, calling for Personal Days, Single Vacation Days PERSONAL BUSINESS etc. and the Crew Dispatcher or the Manager on duty PROFESSIONALLY DECLINES the Employee time off, remarks should be placed in Employee work History, not Master Record, "based on needs or
service unable to allow Employee off for personal business", nothing extravagant or nonsensical, just very simple. If The T & E Employee then marks off sick, We intend to handle that Employee for falsifying a layoff.

If a T & E Employee does mark off in this fashion mark the call in higher ground put to a file, so We can then forward to the appropriate Field Officer for handling under the IDPAP policy.

If a T & E Employee calls for Personal Days, Single Vacation Cays, PERSONAL BUSINESS etc. and the Crew Dispatcher or Manager on duty tells that Employee that the only way They would be permitted off will be by marking off sick, sickness in family, or FMLA. They will in turn be
handled as well as the T & E Employee for falsifying a layoff.
As stated above if this would happen put the recording to file, it will be sent to the appropriate Field Officer for handling, and also to Myself and W. J. Edwards for Crew Dispatcher handling.

c.c. Anita, Mike, Is there any way You can put something together for Me which We can break down into "DESK SPECIFIC" spread sheets, which would identify T & E Employees that have already been approved for FMLA, and those who have every other weekend court ordered child
visitation.

I cannot impress on every one of You how big of an issue this has become, I expect this to be included in job briefings every shift, every day.

I do not want anyone of You coming across as threatening to the Crew Dispatcher, You have to be very professional in letting each and everyone of Them know, it is not Their place to give these Employees alternative avenues to NOT serve Our Customers. Any Questions please be sure to ask.

This message is intended for the MANAGEMENT STAFF of this Region ONLY, I do not want to see it forwarded to a distribution list, nor do I want to see it on a Crew Dispatchers DESK.

Thank You
 
============================================================================================================
 
----------------
-----Original Message-----
From: "Davis, Jeff D" Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 09:19:07 
To:"Edwards, Bill" Cc:"Clapp, Larry" 
Subject: Engineer Miss Calls

Bill - two issues have been brought to my attention that I need to 
bring to resolution.  First - Engineer Tom Cannon, employee number 783350 
is a regularly assigned engineer Selkirk to Boston and was called on his 
rest day 6-25-06.  He refused to take the call and was subsequently 
miss called.  Regularly assigned employees on their rest days are not 
required to take extra work.  I have discussed this issue with Larry Clapp 
and it is requested that Mr. Cannon's miss call be removed from his 
record and the practice of miss calling regularly assigned engineers to 
take extra work be stopped.
 
 
 
Second - the local chairman out of North Jersey has indicated the MU 
and tramp crews that run North Jersey to Selkirk are not being deadheaded 
upon arrival at the away from home terminal.  These crews should be 
returned to North Jersey as they are not in pool assignments.  Can you 
please ensure these crews are being handled properly?    
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Roberts [mailto:RobertsBLET@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 1:26 PM
To: Davis, Jeff D
Cc: Clapp, Larry
Subject: Re: Engineer Miss Calls

Did you get an answer from Bill Edwards?  Can I mark this issue as 
settled?  I need some confirmation that your directive has not been  
ignored. .
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Davis, Jeff D 
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2006 1:34 PM
To: Tom Roberts
Cc: Clapp, Larry
Subject: RE: Engineer Miss Calls

I have not received a confirmation. I will follow up with a phone call.

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Clapp, Larry 
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 8:02 AM
To: Edwards, Bill
Cc: Roberts, Tom (Internet); Fasoldt, Paul; Davis, Jeff D; Meadows, Roy
Subject: RE: Engineer Miss Calls

Bill,

    Give me some peace and remove the missed call from the record T. H. 
Cannon #783350 for June 25, 2006 for Y30125.  

    This started off with an e-mail from Paul Fasoldt to Roy Meadows on 
6/26 advising the missed call placed on the record was improper.  Next 
came and e-mail from VLC Nathan Drown to General Chairman Roberts and 
since then I have seen at least six other e-mails on this subject, plus 
I have received at least five or six phone message on this issue.

    We should not have missed called the regular assigned employee and 
arrange to remove the missed call from his record and give me peace on 
this matter.   


-----Original Message-----
From: "Edwards, Bill" <Bill_Edwards@CSX.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:02:54 
To:"Clapp, Larry" <Larry_Clapp@CSX.com>
Cc:"Roberts, Tom \(Internet\)" <Tom_Roberts_INET@csx.com>,       
"Fasoldt, Paul" <Paul_Fasoldt@CSX.com>,       "Davis, Jeff D" 
<Jeff_D_Davis@CSX.com>,       "Meadows, Roy" <Roy_Meadows@csx.com>
Subject: RE: Engineer Miss Calls

Yes we should have and did. The miss call is good.  

Bill Edwards 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Roberts [mailto:RobertsBLET@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 3:25 PM
To: Clapp, Larry
Cc: Emerick, Howard; Casey, George (Internet); McVeen, Richard 
(Internet); Lyons, William; Billy J. Lyons; Jimmy P Louis; Jimmy P Louis; Kevin 
M. Bourassa; Greg Durocher; Matthew C. Kronyak; Ron E Bernash; Charlie 
Otten; Mike Henry; Angelo J Chick, Jr.; Kenny F. LeFauve; Mike W. 
Fitzgerald; Nathan Drown; Steve Abraham
Subject: Re: Engineer Miss Calls

This answer is unacceptable to this General Committee, and by this 
email I request definitive and immediate relief from Labor Relations to end 
this CMC mockery of our collective bargaining agreement.  Regularly 
assigned Engineers are not required to take Extra Work on their assigned 
Relief Day.  - Tom Roberts, General Chairman
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry


Forwarded Message [ Download File | Save to Yahoo! Briefcase ]

Subject: RE: Engineer Miss Calls
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 15:09:10 -0400
From: "Clapp, Larry" <Larry_Clapp@CSX.com>
To: "Roberts, Tom (Internet)" <Tom_Roberts_INET@csx.com>
CC: "Emerick, Howard" <Howard_Emerick@csx.com>
Tom,

    As we discussed yesterday following a more in depth review of this 
matter, the regular assigned road engineer should have taken the call 
when contacted by the crew caller.  The calling procedures were 
followed. We were out of engineers and had four vacant assignments to fill.  
While we do not encourage calling regular assigned employees on there 
rest day (s), there will be times when the operation changes quickly or 
excessive mark off's prevent us from operating trains. The caller's 
office must reach out to fill vacancies to operate our trains.  We will 
review further with our human resources department and CMC hiring needs in 
the Selkirk area and try and determine is this is a contributing factor 
for calling regular assigned employees on there rest day (s).  In 
addition, we would further like to discuss this matter when you are in 
Jacksonville the week of July 17, 2006. 

 

Brothers:
 
CSX has taken the position that even if you own a Regular Assignment, that assignment does not protect an Engineer from being required to take Extra Work if you are called by CMC.  If an Engineer is on a Regular Assignment with an assigned Regular Rest Day, and is called and contacted with a request to work on his Rest Day, CSX holds that an Engineer so contacted and who answers the phone MUST take the job.  CSX intends to charge an Engineer, who answers the phone but refuses duty, with insubordination. 
 
Therefore, please understand:
 
1) If you are contacted on your defined Rest Day/Day Off, and you answer the phone, you will be expected to go to work, and refusing the call will result in discipline that could include dismissal.  If they get you on the phone, you must go to work.
 
2) You are NOT required to ANSWER your phone on your Rest Day/Day Off, and nobody can make you answer that phone.  This does NOT refer to a pool job that works out, back, and normally lays around a day, but is subject to call on that third day. Pools like this don't have a defined Rest Day/Off Day.  Don't answer the phone unless you want to be required to work.
 
CMC has decided that, even though this Northeast Cornner of CSX is running fine, they want a WAR with T&E, and so -- YES -- consider this as my request that you immediately change your pattern and NOT work your Day Off until further notice, provided you are certain that you own a job that does not require you to work on those days.  Sometimes when we are not getting the respect and cooperation from CMC that we need to get, then we need to show solidarity on rights that we do have left.  If CSX cannot respect the sanctity of a Rest Day/Off Day as has been the custom and practice for years, then we need to remind them that we are not under obligation to baby-sit that phone on the day(s) in question. 
 
This is just another practice that we will continue to battle and oppose on CSX, but -- this is important -- our Membership must protect themselves in the meantime, by only answering the phone with the understanding that they'll  be expected to go to work immediately following that call. 
 
Fraternally,
 
Tom Roberts, General Chairman
Conrail SAA/CSXT Northern District GCA
Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen
A Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters

 

                                                                                                                                 


For those who do not know, Ralph Bonanno was given 30 days for sending this to some other people...I had originally received it from a Cdr who got it
from someplace else...I believe that the Cdr cut and pasted this to me, as
you can see, it originally came from someone named "Vic". CSX charged 
Ralph with
"Conduct Unbecoming a CSX Employee..." As anybody
can see, this is just a parody...While Ralph is not a member of BLE&T 235, he is still a BLE&T Member (Div.601). This is still an issue that can effect us all...I guess CSX has forgotten about
Freedom of Speech.
  Ralph will be appealing the decision and I'm sure will be vindicated. Moral of the story...watch what you send via email... or at least cut off the headings before you send it!!!!

January 3, 2006:
Jackassville, FL:

CSXTransposition Corp. (NYSE:CSX) announced today that
they would implement changes on a 130-mile line in New
York and Northern New Jersey. CSX spokesman Casey
Jones explained "We will make changes to the River
Subdivision to better integrate it into the CSXT
network, and to bring it more in-line with company
standards and practices."

The new changes include improved safety practices,
including two "Continuous Whistle Zones", one each in
Rockland and Ulster Counties in New York State. Along
the line, which runs from Jersey City, NJ to Selkirk,
NY, the zones will run from Clarkstown to Valley
Cottage, NY and from Esopus through Kingston to the
Lake Katrine, NY town line. "Continuous Whistle
Zones" are areas where trains will frequently or
continuously sound their horns to make sure residents
and visitors are awake and aware of each train, which
passes through their area, especially during overnight
hours and on Sunday mornings. To compliment each
"Continuous Whistle Zone" CSX has also launched a
safety incentive program.

The incentive in the Kingston area will be a
$25-dollar Dunkin' Donuts gift certificate for each
crewmember whose train strikes a paid member of the
Kingston Fire Department. A similar arrangement will
be in place in the Town of Clarkstown; where employees
will receive three-days off for hitting an occupied
Clarkstown Police cruiser.

Additional changes to the line will include a new
"Deferred Maintenance Program" designed especially to
help track conditions become more uniform with the
rest of the CSX System. In the past five years CSX
favorably tested the results of Deferred Maintenance
Practices on several random stretches of track,
particularly in Little Ferry and Teaneck, NJ as well
as West Point and Catskill, NY.

This news comes just one month after CSX officially
announced their new policy regarding the movement of
priority traffic. The new policy, called the
"D.A.I.S.Y." plan strives to increase the
quality-of-life for all crews assigned to work on van
and stack trains, which are rush-rush time-sensitive
shipments. The "Delay All Intermodal Shipments Y'all"
or "DAISY" Plan for short, will allow intermodal crews
to "Stop and smell the Daisies". The details of this
plan call for all trains, especially those carrying
municipal solid waste to be strategically positioned
ahead of all trains carrying UPS shipments. This
method of dispatching trains has successfully
diminished average train-speed system-wide, thereby
affording more opportunities for crews to explore the
communities that may be obliterated when one of the
companies trains with improper Haz-Mat paperwork and
paper-thin flanges derails.

Looking ahead, CSX is also formulating a plan to
deploy remote-control locomotives system-wide in the
near future. The operation of remote-control operated
locomotives means only one person is responsible for
the operation of the train. Having only one person in
charge of a train will make it easier for management
to assign blame when a minor accident occurs, thereby
allowing cost savings as many employees get fired.
This will help in achieving another goal of the
companies "One Plan" which focuses on improving
operational elements step by step, by factors of one,
especially cutting jobs and loosing customers one at a
time.

CSX Transportation Inc. operates the most sluggish
railroad in the eastern United States with a
22,000-mile rail network, which bypasses or avoids
adequately serving most major commercial markets in 23
states, the District of Columbia, and two Canadian
provinces. CSXT headquarters are in Jackassville, Fla.
CSXT's parent company, CSX Inc., owns companies
providing damaged shipments, missed connections, and
unreliable services that are among the nation's worst
managed transportation companies, despite connecting
more than 70 river, ocean and lake ports, as well as
more than 200 short line railroads.

=======================================================

Forwarders notes:

The reference to Kingston is in remembrence of a crew that stopped a
long train there (a couple of months ago or so), blocking all [six]
public grade crossings, while they went to breakfast across the
street at Dunkin Donuts for ½ hour; and being turned in by the
Kingston Fire Dept.

The reference to Clarkstown IIRC is in remembrance of a police
cruiser that was parked on the CSX River Line main, for the ofcrs to
enjoy their donuts and coffee.  They thought their cherries on top,
which they turned on for self-preservation, would have the effect of
stopping any train during their picnic.  When the ofcrs realized they
didn't really have control of the trains' brakes and a collission was
imminent they merely abandoned their vehicle instead of removing it
from the tracks.  Prabably with coffee and donuts still in hand!  I
don't know if they cited the engineer for failing to stop for a road
block.

--------------------------------------------------