|
| |
Our New Page which will deal with RCO incidents...on CSX, CR/SAA and
anywhere else...
NS
'electronic belts' in use during wreck....October
15th, 2007
(The following story by Reggie Sheffield appeared on The Patriot-News website
on October 15. BLET Editor’s note: It is assumed the Norfolk Southern
spokesman quoted in the article is describing remote control train operations
when he references “electronic belts.”)
HARRISBURG, Pa. — Firefighters contained about 200 gallons of diesel fuel that
threatened to leak into Swatara Creek after a crash Monday in the Rutherford
train yard, Swatara Twp. officials said.
Township fire chief Darrin Robinson said no one was injured when a Norfolk
Southern Corp. yard engine struck a container hauler car about 5:15 p.m.
According to Robinson, the yard engine was moving east when it hit the rear car
of a long line of container haulers on the same track. A container hauler is a
car used to transport containers such as the ones mounted on tractor-trailers.
The heavy black engine ran partially over the end of the lower-profiled
container hauler and came to rest in a position resembling a jackknifed
tractor-trailer.
Emergency crews worked to contain the fuel leaking from the engine.
“That’s all been contained underneath where the locomotive hit,” Robinson
said.
Emergency vehicles blocked traffic on Derry Street near 69th Street for more
than three hours.
Rudy Husband, a spokesman for Philadelphia-based Norfolk Southern, said the
crash is under investigation. He gave no timeline in which he expected the
investigation to reach a conclusion.
Husband said rail workers communicate by using electronic belts that simplify
directions in the busy and noisy railway yards.
He said yard cars — locomotives used to ferry cars through the yards — are
commonly directed through the use of these belts.
Husband said Monday night that he could not immediately recall any incidents
involving failures of the electronic belts and that he did not know whether
Monday’s crash was the result of the failure of that device.
“That’s going to be part of our investigation,” he said.
“I’m not leaning towards anything. I am saying that I have not ruled out
anything. We’re talking about something that happened less than three hours
ago. Let’s not jump to conclusions,” Husband said.
Onlookers who gathered in the parking lot of The Wharf restaurant, directly
across the street from the crash site, reported a heavy odor of diesel, but
Robinson repeatedly emphasized that the spill had been successfully contained.
“Very little diesel fuel got into the storm water drain,” he said.
Linda Sakelaris, The Wharf’s owner, said everyone in her restaurant during
Monday’s happy hour stopped what they were doing when they heard “a very,
very loud explosion type of sound.”
“We heard it before we saw it,” Sakelaris said.
“It’s not unusual that you hear a lot of noise from the rail yard, but this
was super loud,” she said.
Archie Flores was visiting his brother blocks away when he heard the train
crash.
“We heard it. A bunch of us heard it,” he said.
“We just heard a boom, like a crash,” Flores said.
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
Remote
control train kills UP switchman: Critics say Utah death highlights hazards
(The following story by John O'Connell appeared on the Idaho State Journal
website on April 12.)
RIVERDALE, Utah -- A 38-year-old Union Pacific Railroad switchman was killed
early Monday after he apparently fell under a freight car being pushed by a
remotely-controlled locomotive.
Union Pacific officials have not released the employee's name, pending
notification of members of the family.
But according to the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, whose
members have voiced safety concerns about the use of remotely-controlled
traincar switching, it was the victim's second day of work at the Riverdale
switch yard after a transfer from Salt Lake City. Riverdale is located about 30
miles north of Salt Lake City.
The man had eight months of total experience with the railroad and was not
wearing the appropriate safety gear to assist with remotely-controlled
switching, according to the BLET.
UP has been implementing remotely-controlled operations at switch yards
throughout its system for the past few years. The technology arrived in
Pocatello in February, making the Gate City the first yard in Idaho to start
switching cars without engineers.
It now takes only a foreman and helper working remote control belt packs to
switch cars and make up trains, sometimes up to a half mile away from the
locomotive. When anyone wearing a belt pack falls, a safety mechanism shuts off
the train. Engineers in the switch yards who have been displaced by remote
control trains have been moved to long-haul trains.
Monday's victim was believed to have been riding on the freight car and there
were no witnesses who saw the 3:50 a.m. accident, Union Pacific spokesman John
Bromley said.
Bromley said he was not wearing a belt pack at the time, so the locomotive did
not stop when he fell. When his co-workers lost radio contact with the man, they
searched for him, Bromley said.
"There were no witnesses. But apparently, he fell under the car,"
Bromley said, adding UP is conducting an investigation to determine what
happened. "It's kind of hard to determine if an engineer could have seen
him or not. It's hard to say. There's no way I could guess (if an engineer could
have prevented the accident)."
Detective Nolan Geilmann, of the Riverdale Police Department, said he's in the
midst of an investigation, and he doesn't believe there was any criminal
wrongdoing behind the accident.
"Speculatively, we think he slipped off the train. He was there
alone," Geilmann said.
The Federal Railroad Administration is also investigating the accident,
according to spokesman Warren Flatau. Flatau said the FRA's Region 7 inspector
has already started the investigation, which will entail inspecting equipment
and infrastructure.
Flatau said investigations usually take upwards of seven months.
He said switching is usually conducted at slow speeds, and statistics have shown
remote control switching to be safe.
"We are investigating it as we do with all employee fatalities,"
Flatau said. "I know there was switching going on, but they haven't given
me anything definitive yet."
Flatau said it is too early to determine if the presence of an engineer on the
train would have made a difference.
In their lobbying against remote control trains, BLET leaders have said the
switchmen who operate them have much less experience than the engineers had, an
extra set of eyes is always a good thing and additional workers have been
brought in to make up for inefficiencies of the technology.
To become an operator, an employee with eight months of experience, such as the
victim of the Riverdale accident, is required to have six days of classroom
training and 15 days of training on the job with an instructor.
"He's one of the people we were worried about who may or may not have been
properly trained," said Mike Hysell, the BLET's legislative representative
for southern Idaho and a locomotive engineer on a train from Pocatello to Nampa.
"The amount of time he was employed with the railroad and the experience
(in the Riverdale yard) is definitely a factor."
Jim Lance, chairman of the local BLET, said at this point, it's unclear if the
presence of an engineer could have prevented the accident. However, he agrees
the inexperience of the switchmen UP is allowing to operate remote control
trains is a factor in it.
"He should have had a belt pack on in order to protect him," Lance
said. "It drives right at the heart of the issue. We have a concern about
lack of training and lack of safety."
Tuesday, April 12, 2005
|